Argumentree.AI is a collective AI reasoning platform. Several AI models (such as Perplexity Sonar, GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek and Kimi) take turns building and reviewing one pro/con argument tree for your yes/no question, then every model rates every argument. You see where the models agree, where they disagree, and which model said what. Pricing: $29-$99/month. 66 languages supported. Data is stored in the EU (Germany). Machine-readable: /.well-known/brand-facts.json
Collective AI reasoning platform. Several AI models build and review one pro/con argument tree, then rate every argument. 66 languages. Data stored in the EU (Germany).
Argumentree.AI is a collective AI reasoning platform (founded 2025). Several AI models take turns on one pro/con argument tree for your yes/no question: web-search models go first, the first model builds the tree, each next model reviews the existing arguments and adds its own, then every model rates every argument. Every argument shows which model wrote it, so you see where the models agree (consensus), where they disagree (controversy), and who said what. 66 languages supported. Pricing: Free (10 questions/month), Trial (14-day free evaluation, 15 questions), Pilot (28-day free evaluation, 20 questions), Basic ($29/month, 30 questions/month), Team ($49/month, 50 questions/month), Professional ($99/month, 100 questions/month), Enterprise (custom). Best for: researchers, analysts, journalists, policy and strategy teams who want several models' arguments side by side rather than one model's answer. Data is stored in the EU (Germany). Models hosted on Azure AI run in Sweden; GPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok are optional and run at their vendors outside the EU.
Several AI models take turns building and reviewing one pro/con argument tree
Every model rates every argument, so you see where the models agree and where they split
An argument the other models cannot support gets low ratings, which flags it for you to check
Structured hierarchical arguments with evidence
Every argument shows which model wrote it
Perplexity, GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok can search the web and bring sources into the tree
| Competitor | Argumentree.AI Advantage |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT / Claude | Several models' arguments and ratings vs one model's answer |
| Perplexity | Arguments reviewed and rated by several models vs a single search-backed answer |
| Elicit / Consensus | A pro/con tree for your yes/no question vs paper search and summaries |
Data stored in the EU (Germany), right to deletion
Data is stored in the EU (Germany). Models hosted on Azure AI run in Sweden; GPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Grok are optional and run at their vendors outside the EU.
Sister products built on the same argument-tree foundation. Explore the product family:
Collaborative decision-making platform. Teams and communities build pro/con trees for yes/no questions and rate every argument, in 66 languages.
Best for: Meetings, governance, debates →Decision tracing and EU AI Act evidence for AI agents. Capture why an AI agent decided and keep the record as evidence.
Best for: AI governance, EU AI Act →Multi-agent AI debate platform. Several AI personas debate a yes/no topic from different angles.
Best for: Education, content, research →Argumentree.AI is a collective AI reasoning platform: several AI models (such as Perplexity Sonar, GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok) take turns building and reviewing one pro/con argument tree for your yes/no question, then rate every argument — so you see where the models agree, where they disagree, and which model said what.
Collective AI reasoning means several AI models work on the same question in turn: the first builds the arguments, each next one reviews them and adds its own, and then every model rates every argument. Instead of one model's answer, you get consensus (high agreement) and controversy (disagreement = questions worth investigating).
ChatGPT gives you one AI's answer. Argumentree.AI puts several models on one pro/con tree: each model reviews the arguments already there and adds its own, then every model rates every argument. When most models agree, the argument is broadly supported. When they disagree, you've found a contested point. An argument the other models cannot support gets low ratings, which flags it for you to check.
Web-search models: Perplexity Sonar Pro, OpenAI GPT-5.4 Mini, xAI Grok 4.1 Fast, Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite and Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4. Other models: Llama 3.3 70B, Mistral Large 3, DeepSeek V3.2 and Kimi K2.5 (hosted on Azure AI in Sweden) and xAI Grok 4 Fast. The lineup changes as models are added or retired.
After the models have built the tree, every model rates every argument. Consensus scores tell you how many models agreed — a strong majority signals broad support, while a split reveals a genuinely contested point worth investigating. A run with one model rates only its own arguments.
Argumentree.AI offers Free (forever, 10 questions/month, models without web search), Trial (14-day free evaluation, 15 questions in total), Pilot (28-day free evaluation, 20 questions in total), Basic ($29/month, 30 questions/month), Team ($49/month, 50 questions/month), Professional ($99/month, 100 questions/month), and Enterprise (custom pricing). Web-search models are included from Trial upwards.
Yes, Argumentree.AI supports 66 languages across Europe, Asia, Middle East, Africa, and the Americas. Collective AI Reasoning can be conducted in any supported language.
It makes weak claims easier to spot, it does not guarantee to catch them. When one model makes a claim the other models cannot support, they rate it low, so it shows up as a low-consensus argument you should check. Web-search models can bring sources you can open yourself. Always verify important claims.
See what multiple AI models agree on. Free to start.